...they probably won't give us the point totals for each team, will they? Because that would... essentially be pointing at one of four people as a killer.
Maybe, but if you could confirm enough of the other teams' standings by talking with members of that team, it would essentially be the same as announcing it publicly...
I wish things were just explained from the start. Even if it's overwhelming, it's better than - finding out halfway, when you can't do anything about it.
I don't really know. The only kind I've seen is like the ones on daytime tv.
But usually there's a person being accused from the start. And then them and the person accusing them both get a lawyer, and it's their job to present evidence and argue their case.
Then a group of neutral parties vote, basically, for who they think was right.
[huh. it's probably not going to play out like that here, nahida thinks - or else they would have already been given a suspect? or an accusation would have been made? or... anything, really.
but no names have come up yet. they'll be starting from scratch.]
That does sound more efficient than what we've got to work with so far.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
I thought it would be a couple weeks at least, but now it's like - now one team is already ahead. And another team is down a person...
no subject
no subject
no subject
...even if it was only one member of the team who acted alone, it would put the other three at risk.
no subject
Maybe they could just only tell each team what place they're in...?
no subject
no subject
no subject
[...]
But this is all hypotheticals.
no subject
... But I doubt it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
A lot of this didn't have to be how it is.
no subject
No, it didn't. But... it is the way it is, so we must find a way to work within the confines of what we can do.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But usually there's a person being accused from the start. And then them and the person accusing them both get a lawyer, and it's their job to present evidence and argue their case.
Then a group of neutral parties vote, basically, for who they think was right.
no subject
[huh. it's probably not going to play out like that here, nahida thinks - or else they would have already been given a suspect? or an accusation would have been made? or... anything, really.
but no names have come up yet. they'll be starting from scratch.]
That does sound more efficient than what we've got to work with so far.
no subject
no subject