It might be a good idea to send two people out at a time to examine things, rather than three.
And any physical evidence we have to begin with... we should make examining that a priority, rather than leaving it for later. It might give us some clues as to what we should be looking for to start off with.
if it's a smaller location two's plenty. bigger places we could probably spare three to save time and have them spread out but that's also a good plan we've been doing this for weeks now so we all know the routine everybody should be pitching in to check everything as much as we can at the same time instead of waiting until a theory's presented and a reason why we're checking if that makes sense
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
And any physical evidence we have to begin with... we should make examining that a priority, rather than leaving it for later. It might give us some clues as to what we should be looking for to start off with.
no subject
but that's also a good plan
we've been doing this for weeks now so we all know the routine
everybody should be pitching in to check everything as much as we can at the same time
instead of waiting until a theory's presented and a reason why we're checking
if that makes sense
no subject
This all makes sense.
Let's do our best tomorrow, then. Thank you for talking strategy with me, Jonas.
no subject
i'll see you tomorrow
get some rest when you can
no subject
You, too.